Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julia Middendorf vs Sandra Samir Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Middendorf vs Samir analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Julia Middendorf vs Sandra Samir Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Middendorf 1 - 0 Samir
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Middendorf has won 43.98% of points on their second serve, while Samir has won 48.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Middendorf, in recent form, has won 53.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Samir has won 57.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.46% and 43.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Middendorf has saved 53.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samir has saved 50.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Middendorf has won 55.38% of matches played (W/L 36/ 29), with Samir winning 66.67% (W/L 54/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Middendorf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Samir has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 203/ 114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Middendorf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/ 26), where as Samir has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.47% of matches (W/L 40/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Middendorf winning 1 times and Samir being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Middendorf winning 2 and Samir winning 1. The last match between Middendorf and Samir was at the W35 Stuttgart-Vaihingen, 03-07-2024, First, Clay with Julia Middendorf getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Middendorf and Samir have played a deciding set 1 times, with Middendorf winning 1 times and Samir 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Middendorf winning 0, and Samir 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Middendorf has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.75 while Samir has played against players with an average rank of 165.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Middendorf has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samir has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Middendorf has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samir has converted 48.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
407
Rank
347
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
513
Rank
342
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
59% (110-77)
Career Total W/L
63% (434-250)
53% (17-15)
YTD W/L
67% (26-13)
$5,362
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Julia Middendorf vs Sandra Samir For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Middendorf VS Samir
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Middendorf VS Samir H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Julia Middendorf | Sandra Samir |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:7:0 | 3:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (63/110) | 56% (53/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (42/63) | 68% (36/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (18/47) | 38% (16/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (43/95) | 45% (50/110) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Middendorf VS Samir H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Julia Middendorf
Player
Sandra Samir
57%
(
63 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julia Middendorf | Sandra Samir |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (17/15) | 67% (26/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (37/34) | 64% (56/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (318/323) | 56% (454/358) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (18/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (12/9) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 59 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 117 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:1 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 218.63 | 237.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1165/1888) | 56% (1414/2534) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (721/1165) | 61% (866/1414) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (318/723) | 48% (541/1120) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (105/231) | 49% (182/372) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (838/1897) | 49% (1256/2556) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (13/13) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 78% (18/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (17/32) | 67% (26/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (14/14) | 86% (29/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (14/0) | 14% (29/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (18/3) | 10% (10/1) |
Julia Middendorf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Sandra Samir
57%
(
63 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stephanie Judith Visscher
Player
Julia Middendorf
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Eva Marie Voracek
59%
(
68 of
115)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
36%
(
17 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
58 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Olivia Bergler
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Julia Middendorf
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Julia Victoria Rennert
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Svetac
Player
Julia Middendorf
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Alana Subasic
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Julia Middendorf
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandra Samir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Sandra Samir
57%
(
63 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Nina Radovanovic
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angela Fita Boluda
Player
Sandra Samir
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Isabella Svahn
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Sandra Samir
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Oliwia Szymczuch
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Ada Piestrzynska
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Sandra Samir
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Sandra Samir
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Fanny Ostlund
56%
(
64 of
115)
1st Serve %
73%
(
102 of
139)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
66 of
139)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Middendorf Vs Samir Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Middendorf are available here and Samir photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
